When people such as the police or the army are using a radio to communicate, they say ` Over ' to indicate that they have finished speaking and are waiting for a reply.

Your awful party has known Swalwell was a sexual predator since at least 2019. The only reason anything was done about Swalwell now is that your disgusting party was panicking about losing the CA governor's race. I didn't know. Voters didn't know. Who knew? Who is "the party?" Who is disgusting? Clean up your argument, show the evidence, or sit ...

Why should, asks what you think are aspects or POTENTIAL aspects of the career that would cause a young professional to desire it. If this was a conversation as to how to increase the number of people in the field the answer could include aspects that do not currently exist. While the aspect could exist in potential, it would have to be real.

For why' can be idiomatic in certain contexts, but it sounds rather old-fashioned. Googling 'for why' (in quotes) I discovered that there was a single word 'forwhy' in Middle English.

7 There actually does seem to be an explanation for the different spellings of speak and speech, and it even covers why speech would have variant spellings with <ea>. The ancestors of these words had different vowels in Proto-Germanic.

1 1 - It is "Why did he not come to work?" 2 -The shortened form is "Why didn't he come to work?" This is something that confuses learners. But almost everybody discovers by reading that in the long form (1) "did" and "not" don't stand together. Everybody has to learn this except Germans who say it in the same way. I mean the long form.